I'm inclined to be in favor of a Day 1 lynch, be it random or not. I of course would prefer to have evidence pointing towards an individual, but that rarely happens on Day 1. Rereading the whole thread from the beginning I found it interesting that 12 out of the first 15 posts centered around
Deborah's near miss. Which is only fair because there was that question of whether she was protected or if the SK's have limited abilities. I'm leaning more towards the later. What I found interesting was theferrets interest in the whole discussion. It's almost like he was disappointed that his kill shot failed and so he attempted to paint Deborah in a less than favorable light. i.e....Quoted from theferret:
01-24-06 08:10 #5
I'm wondering what other people think about Deb's story. What kind of role might she have, that she has inherant night protection? I've found that those roles are usually scum.
Quoted from Ovidius:
01-24-06 08:20 #7
I can't see her having permanent automatic immunity from night kills. I've never seen a role like that here, but if what you say about them being scummy roles is true, then Deb's cover has been blown by the mod... Pretty unfair if you ask me.
Quoted from theferret:
01-24-06 08:22 #8
I've seen them several times. Often a mafia godfather will have it, and occasionally other scum roles.
...For now I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, but we should keep it in mind.
To which Debbie replys:
Quoted from Debbie:
01-24-06 08:40 #9
there is no indication that Deborah is me. Although that is my real name...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quoted from theferret:
#8
I'm not entirely sure it makes sense in this game to give all three SKs night protection
Quoted from Debbie:
#9
makes no sense at all, in my experience, nobody has had permanent night protection. Mafia godfathers usually have immunity protection from cops (if investigated they show to be innocent)
To which theferret replies:
Quoted from theferret:
01-24-06 13:55 #15
Deb seemed a little too defensive for my taste.
Now, when a person is the topic of discussion in 12 out of the first 15 posts and several of those posts attempt to paint that person in a bad light, doesn't that person have the right to defend themself? And when that person does, they are then accused of being "defensive"...huh?
So where am I going with this...hell, I don't know...I just felt like typing something this morning. 
VOTE: theferret Have a great day!!